Conclusions Although both direct and indirect digitalization facilitate the fabrication of single crowns and three-unit FDPs with clinically acceptable marginal fit, a significantly better marginal fit was noted with direct digitalization. Digital impressions are also less time-consuming for the dental practitioner and the patient. Clinical relevance The results show that a direct, intraoral, digitalized impression technique is more accurate and efficient when compared with conventional impressions in fabricating single crowns and three-unit FDPs. (Source: Clinical Oral Investigations)
MedWorm Sponsor Message: Directory of the best January Sales in the UK. Find the best Christmas presents too.
