ConclusionBone?to?implant contact and BD increased with time in both SAE?HD and SAE implants. No significant differences were observed between the two different implant surfaces for any of the evaluated parameters and at any observation time?point. (Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research)
MedWorm: Dentistry
Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid?etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid?etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs
Posted in Dental News.
Comments Off on Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid?etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid?etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs
– August 3, 2016